Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-50
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Released June 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced May 2017
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-50, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and WG-50 (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-FH100 was brought out 8 years before the WG-50 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the EX-FH100 matches up versus the WG-50 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 & Ricoh WG-50. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Ricoh WG-50
| EX-FH100 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Casio EX-FH100
| WG-50 | EX-FH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2017 |  | June 2010 | More recent by 84 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Ricoh WG-50
| EX-FH100 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-FH100 features outer dimensions of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-50 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-50 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the EX-FH100 and the WG-50.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH100 and WG-50 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to see the gap in sensor measurements simply by viewing technical specs. The photograph below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH100 and WG-50.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Ricoh WG-50 to render extra detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The older EX-FH100 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-06-16 | 2017-05-24 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 201 grams (0.44 lbs) | 193 grams (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $299 | $280 |