Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-70
92 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced June 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2020
- New Model is Ricoh WG-80
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
In this article, we will be looking at the Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-70, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and WG-70 (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-FH100 was announced 10 years prior to the WG-70 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-FH100 matches up against the WG-70 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 & Ricoh WG-70. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery & Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Ricoh WG-70
| EX-FH100 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Casio EX-FH100
| WG-70 | EX-FH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2020 |  | June 2010 | More recent by 117 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Ricoh WG-70
| EX-FH100 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FH100 offers physical measurements of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-70 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-70 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-FH100 compared to the WG-70.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FH100 and WG-70 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to envision the contrast in sensor measurements purely by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic below will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FH100 and WG-70.
Clearly, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Ricoh WG-70 to provide more detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older EX-FH100 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2010-06-16 | 2020-02-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 201g (0.44 lbs) | 193g (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $299 | $280 |
