Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-80
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
91 Imaging
43 Features
35 Overall
39
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2022
- Old Model is Ricoh WG-70
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
Following is a in-depth overview of the Casio EX-FH100 versus Ricoh WG-80, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and WG-80 (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-FH100 was manufactured 13 years before the WG-80 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple view of how the EX-FH100 matches up vs the WG-80 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 & Ricoh WG-80. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery & Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Ricoh WG-80
| EX-FH100 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.70" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Casio EX-FH100
| WG-80 | EX-FH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2022 |  | June 2010 | More modern by 145 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Ricoh WG-80
| EX-FH100 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FH100 comes with external dimensions of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-80 has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-FH100 versus Ricoh WG-80 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-FH100 versus the WG-80.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH100 and WG-80 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizes only by looking at specs. The image here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH100 and WG-80.
All in all, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-80 to give extra detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics more aggressively. The more aged EX-FH100 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Ricoh WG-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Ricoh WG-80 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-06-16 | 2022-05-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.70" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 201 grams (0.44 lbs) | 193 grams (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 images |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $299 | $300 |