Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-M1
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Here is a in-depth analysis of the Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-M1, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and WG-M1 (14MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-FH100 was launched 5 years prior to the WG-M1 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the EX-FH100 grades against the WG-M1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 and Ricoh WG-M1. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Ricoh WG-M1
EX-FH100 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 115k | Clearer screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Casio EX-FH100
WG-M1 | EX-FH100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2014 | June 2010 | Fresher by 51 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Ricoh WG-M1
EX-FH100 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FH100 offers exterior measurements of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has sizing of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-FH100 versus the WG-M1.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FH100 and WG-M1 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to envision the gap between sensor sizing merely by reviewing technical specs. The visual here may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FH100 and WG-M1.
As you can tell, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Ricoh WG-M1 to offer you more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots more aggressively. The older EX-FH100 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FH100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2010-06-16 | 2014-09-12 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | (1×) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 1.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 115k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 201 gr (0.44 pounds) | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-90 | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $299 | $2,000 |