Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung CL80
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
95 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung CL80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Released June 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
- Additionally Known as ST5500
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung CL80 Overview
Here is a complete overview of the Casio EX-FH100 and Samsung CL80, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Casio and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and CL80 (14MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-FH100 was launched 6 months later than the CL80 so they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-FH100 being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL80 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going through a full comparison, below is a short overview of how the EX-FH100 grades against the CL80 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung CL80 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 and Samsung CL80. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery and Samsung CL80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Samsung CL80
| EX-FH100 | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the Casio EX-FH100
| CL80 | EX-FH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3.7" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.7") |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Samsung CL80
| EX-FH100 | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2010 |  | January 2010 | Same generation |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung CL80 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-FH100 has got exterior measurements of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) while the Samsung CL80 has specifications of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-FH100 and Samsung CL80 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-FH100 against the CL80.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH100 and CL80 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung CL80 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizing only by checking out specifications. The graphic here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FH100 and CL80.
Plainly, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should expect the Samsung CL80 to provide extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung CL80 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung CL80 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Samsung CL80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Samsung CL80 |
| Otherwise known as | - | ST5500 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2010-06-16 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 4800 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 201 grams (0.44 lbs) | 160 grams (0.35 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $299 | $400 |