Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung DV300F
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung DV300F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Announced June 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 133g - 95 x 57 x 18mm
- Released January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung DV300F Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Casio EX-FH100 and Samsung DV300F, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and DV300F (16MP) but they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-FH100 was released 18 months before the DV300F making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick view of how the EX-FH100 grades versus the DV300F for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung DV300F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 and Samsung DV300F. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery and Samsung DV300F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Samsung DV300F
| EX-FH100 | DV300F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung DV300F over the Casio EX-FH100
| DV300F | EX-FH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | June 2010 | Fresher by 18 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Samsung DV300F
| EX-FH100 | DV300F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung DV300F Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-FH100 has got physical dimensions of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Samsung DV300F has specifications of 95mm x 57mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-FH100 and Samsung DV300F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-FH100 versus the DV300F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH100 and DV300F is 92 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung DV300F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizing merely by looking at specifications. The visual below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FH100 and DV300F.
To sum up, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Samsung DV300F to give more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-FH100 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung DV300F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung DV300F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Samsung DV300F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Samsung DV300F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-06-16 | 2012-01-02 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 201 gr (0.44 pounds) | 133 gr (0.29 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 95 x 57 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | BP88 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $299 | $200 |