Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung HZ35W
92 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Other Name is WB650
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Casio EX-FH100 versus Samsung HZ35W, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-FH100 was brought out about the same time to the HZ35W and they are of a similar age. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the EX-FH100 grades against the HZ35W when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 & Samsung HZ35W. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Samsung HZ35W
| EX-FH100 | HZ35W |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Casio EX-FH100
| HZ35W | EX-FH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Samsung HZ35W
| EX-FH100 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2010 |  | June 2010 | Same age |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FH100 enjoys external measurements of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-FH100 versus Samsung HZ35W in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-FH100 versus the HZ35W.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH100 and HZ35W is 92 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions simply by seeing technical specs. The image below should offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FH100 and HZ35W.
As you have seen, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can anticipate the Samsung HZ35W to produce greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a bit more aggressively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also referred to as | - | WB650 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-06-16 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 201 gr (0.44 lbs) | 245 gr (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $299 | $300 |
