Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL102
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Additionally referred to as ES55
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
The following is a in-depth overview of the Casio EX-FH100 versus Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is relatively similar and they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-FH100 was brought out 18 months after the SL102 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the EX-FH100 grades against the SL102 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 & Samsung SL102. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Samsung SL102
| EX-FH100 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2010 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 18 months |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Casio EX-FH100
| SL102 | EX-FH100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Samsung SL102
| EX-FH100 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FH100 has got outside dimensions of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-FH100 versus Samsung SL102 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-FH100 vs the SL102.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH100 and SL102 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to see the gap between sensor dimensions merely by going over technical specs. The image below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH100 and SL102.
As you can tell, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same resolution and you can expect similar quality of photos however you would want to factor the age of the products into consideration. The newer EX-FH100 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Samsung SL102 |
| Also Known as | - | ES55 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 201 gr (0.44 lbs) | 116 gr (0.26 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $299 | $130 |