Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL202
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Additionally referred to as PL50
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL202, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is fairly close and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-FH100 was announced 17 months after the SL202 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summary of how the EX-FH100 grades vs the SL202 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 and Samsung SL202. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Samsung SL202
| EX-FH100 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2010 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 17 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Casio EX-FH100
| SL202 | EX-FH100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Samsung SL202
| EX-FH100 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FH100 provides exterior dimensions of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL202 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-FH100 vs the SL202.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH100 and SL202 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to see the gap in sensor dimensions only by looking through specs. The pic here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH100 and SL202.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical megapixels so you should expect comparable quality of files but you would want to take the production date of the cameras into account. The more recent EX-FH100 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Samsung SL202 |
| Also called | - | PL50 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 201g (0.44 lbs) | 168g (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $299 | $140 |