Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL30
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
95 Imaging
33 Features
14 Overall
25
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 140g - 94 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Also Known as ES15
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL30 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Casio EX-FH100 and Samsung SL30, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and the SL30 (10MP) is pretty similar and both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-FH100 was launched 17 months later than the SL30 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-FH100 matches up versus the SL30 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL30 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 and Samsung SL30. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery and Samsung SL30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Samsung SL30
| EX-FH100 | SL30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2010 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 17 months |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL30 over the Casio EX-FH100
| SL30 | EX-FH100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Samsung SL30
| EX-FH100 | SL30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL30 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FH100 enjoys exterior dimensions of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL30 has measurements of 94mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-FH100 and Samsung SL30 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select during that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-FH100 compared to the SL30.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FH100 and SL30 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL30 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to envision the difference between sensor measurements simply by going over a spec sheet. The visual here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH100 and SL30.
As you can see, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the identical resolution and you should expect similar quality of files though you may want to consider the production date of the products into consideration. The more modern EX-FH100 is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL30 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL30 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Samsung SL30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Samsung SL30 |
| Also referred to as | - | ES15 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 201 grams (0.44 lb) | 140 grams (0.31 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 94 x 61 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $299 | $93 |