Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL620
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Released June 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL65
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL620 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL620, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and the SL620 (12MP) is fairly close and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-FH100 was released 17 months after the SL620 making them a generation away from one another. The two cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FH100 being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick view of how the EX-FH100 matches up vs the SL620 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 & Samsung SL620. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery & Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Samsung SL620
| EX-FH100 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2010 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 17 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Casio EX-FH100
| SL620 | EX-FH100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Samsung SL620
| EX-FH100 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FH100 has physical measurements of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) and the Samsung SL620 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL620 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-FH100 and the SL620.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH100 and SL620 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizes only by researching technical specs. The image underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FH100 and SL620.
As you have seen, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You can anticipate the Samsung SL620 to provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos way more aggressively. The fresher EX-FH100 provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Samsung SL620 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Samsung SL620 |
| Otherwise known as | - | PL65 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2010-06-16 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 201 grams (0.44 lbs) | 168 grams (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $299 | $200 |