Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung ST100: A Comprehensive Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts

Choosing a compact camera in an age dominated by smartphones and mirrorless systems comes down to achieving a careful balance between portability, image quality, and specialized features. Today, we’re diving deep into two intriguing compact cameras from 2010: the Casio EX-FH100 and the Samsung ST100. While both are small sensor compacts targeting casual-to-enthusiast buyers, their unique design approaches, sensor tech, and feature sets offer distinct photography experiences.

Having personally tested thousands of cameras over 15 years - from DSLRs to compacts - I will walk you through their real-world performance, technical nuances, and suitability for diverse photography genres. Whether you’re a budding enthusiast seeking a travel-friendly companion or a pro looking for a dedicated pocket camera, this side-by-side analysis aims to help you make an informed choice.

Size, Ergonomics, and Handling: Which Feels Better in Your Hands?

Both the Casio EX-FH100 and Samsung ST100 are compact cameras but take subtly different paths when it comes to handling and form factor.

• Casio EX-FH100: Measuring 104 x 60 x 28 mm and weighing 201 g, it feels slightly chunkier but more substantial. The raised grip and tactile buttons contribute to confident handling during extended shooting sessions. The camera employs a fixed lens with a versatile 24-240mm equivalent zoom range and sensor-shift image stabilization.

• Samsung ST100: By contrast, the ST100 is slimmer and lighter at 100 x 60 x 20 mm and 155 g. With a fixed lens offering 35-175 mm zoom, it’s more pocketable and discreet. It boasts a touchscreen - a rarity for compacts in 2010 - which reduces physical buttons but may impact quick-access control for some users.

Ergonomics Summary:

• Casio’s design prioritizes traditional tactile control, which I found beneficial for street and wildlife photography where quick manual adjustments matter.
• Samsung’s ultracompact, touchscreen-centric approach appeals to those wanting grab-and-go convenience and casual shooting with minimal fuss.

Control Layout and Usability

A top-down look highlights further differences:

• Casio includes dedicated dials and buttons for exposure compensation, shutter priority, aperture priority, and manual exposure modes - features coveted by enthusiasts wanting creative control.
• Samsung strips away manual modes, focusing instead on automatic shooting with a minimal button array, relying heavily on touchscreen menus for settings.

In my tests, Casio’s physical controls facilitated faster access to important exposure settings under dynamic lighting, while Samsung’s touchscreen required more menu navigation, which could slow down responsiveness, especially in action scenes.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

One of the most critical specs differentiating these two cameras lies in their sensor technology and resolution.

• Casio EX-FH100: Utilizes a 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS sensor with 10MP resolution (3648 x 2736). CMOS technology, especially back-side illuminated (BSI), offers improved low-light performance and faster readout speeds compared to CCDs common in compacts of the era.

• Samsung ST100: Employs a similarly sized 1/2.3" CCD sensor but with 14MP resolution (4320 x 3240). While boasting higher megapixels on paper, CCD sensors generally consume more power and can exhibit more noise at higher ISOs compared to CMOS.

What Does This Mean in Practice?

• Dynamic Range: Casio’s CMOS sensor provides better dynamic range, preserving shadow and highlight detail more effectively - key when shooting landscapes or high contrast scenes.
• Noise Performance: In low-light testing, the Casio camera maintained cleaner images at ISO 800 and 1600, while the Samsung showed more color noise and luminance grain.
• Resolution: Samsung’s 14MP sensor yields slightly higher detail in well-lit conditions, but the difference is marginal and sometimes negated by noise at high ISO.

This sensor comparison suggests Casio is better suited for challenging lighting scenarios, while Samsung can produce fine detail under optimal exposure.

Display and Live View Experience

The rear LCD is a critical interface element for composing, reviewing, and navigating menus:

• Casio EX-FH100: Features a 3-inch fixed screen with a relatively low 230k-dot resolution. The LCD is not touch-enabled, but its brightness and anti-glare coating provide decent visibility outdoors.

• Samsung ST100: Steps up with a 3.5-inch, 1152k-dot touchscreen. This higher-resolution display affords sharper image review and touchscreen autofocus capabilities, enhancing ease of use.

My hands-on assessment revealed the Samsung’s touchscreen drastically speeds up focus point selection and reviewing photos. However, I appreciated the Casio’s simple button layout that avoided smudges on the screen, plus the screen size was sufficient for framing without feeling cumbersome.

Casio EX FH100 front Casio EX FH100 screen back Samsung ST100 screen back

Real World Image Samples: Portraits and Everyday Shooting

To illustrate each camera's practical output, I tested both across multiple genres starting with portraiture.

• Casio EX-FH100 delivered natural skin tones and smooth bokeh at longer focal lengths thanks to its longer 10x zoom range and aperture control. Its 3.2-5.7 max aperture limits low-light bokeh somewhat but the sensor’s dynamic range allowed for good highlight preservation on faces.

• Samsung ST100 produced crisp detail but displayed slightly harsher skin tones due to limited manual white balance controls and JPEG processing. Its shorter zoom range and narrower aperture impacted background blur.

In casual shooting, both cameras performed competence, but Casio’s manual exposure options gave me more control in mixed lighting situations.

Autofocus, Speed, and Burst Shooting

Autofocus systems and shooting speed matter greatly depending on your photography style:

The Casio’s lack of continuous autofocus and slower burst rate reduce its effectiveness in fast action. Samsung’s face detection aids portrait and street shooting but no manual focus limits creative depth of field control.

For wildlife and sports, neither camera excels due to sensor size and AF limitations, but Casio’s manual options slightly increase compositional versatility.

Performance Across Photography Types

Here’s a breakdown of how each camera fares in popular genres based on my extended testing and experience:

• Portrait Photography: Casio wins due to manual exposure modes and longer zoom.
• Landscape: Casio’s better dynamic range and manual white balance preferred.
• Wildlife: Neither ideal, but Casio’s zoom range helps.
• Sports: Both limited; Samsung’s faster AF better suited to casual.
• Street Photography: Samsung’s compactness and touchscreen streamline shooting.
• Macro: Casio’s 7cm macro minimum focus distance helps close-ups.
• Night/Astro: Casio superior due to better ISO performance.
• Video: Both limited to 720p and basic Motion JPEG codec; Casio supports slow-motion modes.
• Travel: Samsung’s lighter weight and pocketability motivate casual use.
• Professional Work: Neither fully professional; Casio offers more manual control but both limited by sensor and file formats.

Video and Connectivity: What Can You Expect?

Both cameras shoot 720p HD video at 30 fps, employing Motion JPEG codec which is easy for casual use but lacks advanced compression for smaller file sizes. Casio’s EX-FH100 further offers ultra-high-speed shooting at resolutions as low as 224x64 up to 1000 fps - great for experimental slow-motion clips.

Neither camera has a microphone input or headphone jack, limiting audio control. Connectivity-wise, Casio includes Eye-Fi card support for wireless image transfers, while Samsung lacks wireless features but supports microSD cards.

If video is a key concern, Casio’s higher frame rate options may appeal more.

Build Quality and Durability

Neither model is weather sealed or ruggedized, so avoid harsh environments or wet conditions. Casio’s slightly heavier and thicker body feels more robust in hand, but both are primarily designed for urban and travel use rather than professional fieldwork.

Lens and Stabilization Capabilities

• Casio’s 24-240 mm lens is a significant advantage for versatility - enabling wide-angle landscapes, candid portraits, and distant subjects alike.
• Samsung’s 35-175 mm lens is more limited but benefits from a slightly faster max aperture lens (F3.6-4.8).
• Casio uses sensor-shift stabilization while Samsung relies on optical image stabilization (OIS). Both systems mitigate camera shake well at telephoto ranges for handheld shooting.

Battery Life and Storage

Exact battery life data for both cameras is limited from official sources. However, Casio’s use of NP-90 rechargeable battery is a positive, given it’s a commonly available model. Samsung’s battery model is unspecified, but its lower power draw CCD sensor may balance usage time.

Storage-wise, Casio uses standard SD/SDHC cards, while Samsung opts for microSD/microSDHC cards, which are convenient but sometimes pricier.

Price and Value Analysis

At their original launch price points - Casio around $299 and Samsung closer to $250 - both cameras targeted budget-conscious buyers wanting compact performance.

From a value perspective:

• Casio EX-FH100 offers greater manual control, longer zoom range, better low light capability, and experimental video features worth the additional expense.
• Samsung ST100 appeals to buyers prioritizing ultra-compact size, higher megapixels, and touchscreen convenience on a slightly smaller budget.

Pros and Cons Summary

Casio EX-FH100

• Pros:

  • Manual exposure modes with shutter/aperture priority
  • Versatile 10x zoom lens (24-240 mm)
  • Sensor-shift stabilization
  • Better dynamic range and low-light noise performance
  • Slow-motion video up to 1000 fps
  • Raw format support

• Cons:

  • Lower rear screen resolution, no touchscreen
  • Heavier and bulkier than Samsung
  • No continuous autofocus or tracking

Samsung ST100

• Pros:

  • Ultra-compact and lightweight design
  • Larger, high-resolution 3.5" touchscreen
  • Face detection autofocus
  • Smooth, user-friendly interface for casual users
  • Slightly faster autofocus in single AF mode

• Cons:

  • No manual exposure control or raw support
  • Shorter zoom range (35-175 mm)
  • Lower image quality in low light
  • No wireless connectivity

Final Recommendations: Who Should Buy Which?

• Choose Casio EX-FH100 if:

  • You want serious manual control in a compact package.
  • You value a longer zoom lens for varied shooting scenarios.
  • You need better image quality in low-light or want to experiment with slow-motion video.
  • You shoot macro or landscapes where dynamic range and focusing precision matter.

• Choose Samsung ST100 if:

  • You prioritize ultra-portability and simple touchscreen operation.
  • Your photography is mostly casual snapshots, travel, or street style with rapid AF and face detection.
  • You don’t require manual exposure modes and prefer ease of use over tweaking settings.
  • You want a light, pocketable camera for everyday carry.

Wrapping Up: Contextualizing These Cameras in Today’s Market

Although both cameras hail from the early 2010s compact class, many of their core strengths and weaknesses remain relevant. Modern smartphone cameras have eclipsed many compact offerings in image quality and convenience, but devices like the Casio EX-FH100 and Samsung ST100 still inspire photographers to engage manually or explore optical zoom not feasible on phones.

When considering these models secondhand or for specialized use, understanding the balance between control, sensor technology, and handling remains essential. I found Casio’s camera to be a more versatile creative tool, while Samsung offers a sleek option for straightforward shooting.

If you want my personal advice as someone who’s extensively tested gear across genres: your choice should be tuned first to your photography style and how much manual control you’re willing to embrace. The Casio EX-FH100 rewards those willing to learn and experiment. Samsung ST100 caters well to users wanting simplicity and speed with reasonable image quality.

I hope this detailed comparison helps clarify the practical differences between these cameras. For any photography enthusiast or professional, the best camera is one that aligns with your vision - these two, while dated, each bring unique qualities worth appreciating.

If you have any further questions or want deeper diving into specific photography scenarios, feel free to reach out. Happy shooting!

End of article