Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
55 Imaging
54 Features
82 Overall
65
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 808g - 136 x 97 x 132mm
- Revealed February 2019
- Replaced the Panasonic FZ1000
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the TG-320 (14MP) and FZ1000 II (20MP) and the TG-320 (1/2.3") and FZ1000 II (1") come with different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-320 was introduced 8 years prior to the FZ1000 II which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 II being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the TG-320 scores versus the FZ1000 II when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-320 & Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-320 Gallery & Panasonic FZ1000 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Panasonic FZ1000 II
TG-320 | FZ1000 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 II over the Olympus TG-320
FZ1000 II | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2019 | January 2012 | Newer by 86 months | |
Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1240k | 230k | Clearer display (+1010k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Panasonic FZ1000 II
TG-320 | FZ1000 II |
---|
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-320 enjoys physical measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ1000 II has dimensions of 136mm x 97mm x 132mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 5.2") with a weight of 808 grams (1.78 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the TG-320 against the FZ1000 II.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-320 and FZ1000 II is 94 and 55 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to picture the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-320 and FZ1000 II.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The TG-320 having a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Panasonic FZ1000 II will deliver greater detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images much more aggressively. The more aged TG-320 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Specifications
Olympus TG-320 | Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus TG-320 | Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II |
Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2019-02-18 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8-4.0 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 1,240 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m | 13.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off, 1st / 2nd Slow Sync. |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 155 gr (0.34 lb) | 808 gr (1.78 lb) |
Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 136 x 97 x 132mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 photographs | 350 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | DMW-BLC12PP |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $0 | $898 |