Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung ST95
92 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
99 Imaging
39 Features
19 Overall
31
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Announced June 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung ST95 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Casio EX-FH100 versus Samsung ST95, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and ST95 (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-FH100 was announced 7 months before the ST95 and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-FH100 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick view of how the EX-FH100 matches up versus the ST95 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 & Samsung ST95. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery & Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Samsung ST95
EX-FH100 | ST95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Casio EX-FH100
ST95 | EX-FH100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2011 | June 2010 | More recent by 7 months | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Samsung ST95
EX-FH100 | ST95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-FH100 has got exterior dimensions of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) while the Samsung ST95 has proportions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-FH100 versus Samsung ST95 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-FH100 against the ST95.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FH100 and ST95 is 92 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements merely by looking through specs. The photograph below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH100 and ST95.
All in all, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can expect the Samsung ST95 to render extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-FH100 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Samsung ST95 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Samsung ST95 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2010-06-16 | 2011-01-19 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | - |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | () |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
Macro focus range | 7cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 201 grams (0.44 lb) | - |
Dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $299 | $145 |