Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung TL225
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
94 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Announced August 2009
- Other Name is ST550
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung TL225 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Casio EX-FH100 and Samsung TL225, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and the TL225 (12MP) is fairly close and both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-FH100 was manufactured 11 months after the TL225 and they are of a similar generation. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FH100 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief view of how the EX-FH100 scores vs the TL225 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung TL225 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 and Samsung TL225. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery and Samsung TL225 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Samsung TL225
| EX-FH100 | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | June 2010 |  | August 2009 | More modern by 11 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Casio EX-FH100
| TL225 | EX-FH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 1152k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+922k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Samsung TL225
| EX-FH100 | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FH100 features outside dimensions of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) while the Samsung TL225 has dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") and a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-FH100 and Samsung TL225 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-FH100 against the TL225.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH100 and TL225 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes purely by researching a spec sheet. The pic here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FH100 and TL225.
Clearly, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Samsung TL225 to provide you with extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos more aggressively. The younger EX-FH100 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung TL225 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Samsung TL225 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Samsung TL225 |
| Otherwise known as | - | ST550 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2010-06-16 | 2009-08-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3.5" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,152k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 201 grams (0.44 lb) | 187 grams (0.41 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $299 | $488 |
