Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB250F
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Following is a in-depth review of the Casio EX-FH100 and Samsung WB250F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and WB250F (14MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-FH100 was manufactured 3 years before the WB250F which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the EX-FH100 matches up against the WB250F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 and Samsung WB250F. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery and Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Samsung WB250F
| EX-FH100 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Casio EX-FH100
| WB250F | EX-FH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | June 2010 | More modern by 31 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Samsung WB250F
| EX-FH100 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-FH100 features outer measurements of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) while the Samsung WB250F has specifications of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-FH100 and Samsung WB250F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the EX-FH100 against the WB250F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH100 and WB250F is 92 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to see the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reviewing specifications. The image underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FH100 and WB250F.
To sum up, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Samsung WB250F to offer extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged EX-FH100 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Samsung WB250F |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 201 gr (0.44 pounds) | 226 gr (0.50 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $299 | $250 |