Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB350F
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Announced June 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Revealed January 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Casio EX-FH100 and Samsung WB350F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and WB350F (16MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-FH100 was launched 4 years earlier than the WB350F and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-FH100 matches up vs the WB350F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 and Samsung WB350F. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery and Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Samsung WB350F
| EX-FH100 | WB350F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Casio EX-FH100
| WB350F | EX-FH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 |  | June 2010 | Fresher by 43 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Samsung WB350F
| EX-FH100 | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FH100 provides outside measurements of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) while the Samsung WB350F has measurements of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-FH100 and Samsung WB350F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-FH100 and the WB350F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH100 and WB350F is 92 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing simply by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic below should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FH100 and WB350F.
Clearly, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Samsung WB350F to result in more detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The older EX-FH100 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Samsung WB350F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Samsung WB350F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-06-16 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 201g (0.44 lb) | 276g (0.61 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $299 | $260 |