Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB700
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
98 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced December 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB700 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Casio EX-FH100 versus Samsung WB700, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Samsung. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and WB700 (14MP) but they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-FH100 was unveiled 6 months before the WB700 so they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-FH100 scores against the WB700 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 & Samsung WB700. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery & Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Samsung WB700
| EX-FH100 | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Casio EX-FH100
| WB700 | EX-FH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Samsung WB700
| EX-FH100 | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | June 2010 |  | December 2010 | Similar age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FH100 enjoys exterior dimensions of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) while the Samsung WB700 has dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-FH100 versus Samsung WB700 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the EX-FH100 vs the WB700.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FH100 and WB700 is 92 and 98 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizes only by reading a spec sheet. The image underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH100 and WB700.
As you can see, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Samsung WB700 to offer you extra detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos much more aggressively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Samsung WB700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Samsung WB700 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2010-12-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | () |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 201g (0.44 pounds) | - |
| Dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $299 | $300 |
