Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB750
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Released June 2010
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Revealed September 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB750 Overview
Here is a extensive comparison of the Casio EX-FH100 versus Samsung WB750, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and WB750 (13MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-FH100 was unveiled 14 months earlier than the WB750 making them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the EX-FH100 grades vs the WB750 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 & Samsung WB750. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery & Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Samsung WB750
| EX-FH100 | WB750 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Casio EX-FH100
| WB750 | EX-FH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2011 |  | June 2010 | Fresher by 14 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Samsung WB750
| EX-FH100 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FH100 comes with physical dimensions of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB750 has sizing of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-FH100 versus Samsung WB750 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-FH100 and the WB750.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH100 and WB750 is 92 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to picture the gap in sensor sizing simply by checking out technical specs. The graphic below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FH100 and WB750.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can expect to see the Samsung WB750 to provide extra detail having an extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The older EX-FH100 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-FH100 vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Samsung WB750 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Samsung WB750 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-06-16 | 2011-09-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 13MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4096 x 3072 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.30 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 201g (0.44 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $299 | $339 |