Casio EX-FH100 vs Sony A300
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
64 Imaging
48 Features
45 Overall
46
Casio EX-FH100 vs Sony A300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Revealed January 2008
- Refreshed by Sony A330
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-FH100 vs Sony A300 Overview
Following is a complete overview of the Casio EX-FH100 and Sony A300, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Casio and Sony. The resolution of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and the A300 (10MP) is relatively well matched but the EX-FH100 (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) possess different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-FH100 was launched 2 years after the A300 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FH100 being a Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the EX-FH100 scores vs the A300 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-FH100 vs Sony A300 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A300. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery and Sony A300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Sony A300
| EX-FH100 | A300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2010 |  | January 2008 | More modern by 29 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Casio EX-FH100
| A300 | EX-FH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Sony A300
| EX-FH100 | A300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FH100 enjoys outside dimensions of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Sony A300 has measurements of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-FH100 and Sony A300 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-FH100 vs the A300.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FH100 and A300 is 92 and 64 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizes only by looking at technical specs. The image below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FH100 and A300.
As you have seen, both cameras offer the same exact megapixels albeit different sensor sizes. The EX-FH100 uses the tinier sensor which will make obtaining shallow depth of field trickier. The newer EX-FH100 should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-FH100 vs Sony A300 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Sony |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2008-01-30 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 201g (0.44 lb) | 632g (1.39 lb) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 64 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 538 |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $299 | $0 |