Casio EX-FH100 vs Sony T900
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34


96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Casio EX-FH100 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Revealed February 2009

Casio EX-FH100 vs Sony T900 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-FH100 vs Sony T900, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Casio and Sony. The resolution of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and the T900 (12MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The EX-FH100 was revealed 17 months later than the T900 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FH100 being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the EX-FH100 scores against the T900 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-FH100 vs Sony T900 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Sony T900
EX-FH100 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2010 | ![]() | February 2009 | More recent by 17 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Casio EX-FH100
T900 | EX-FH100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Sony T900
EX-FH100 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FH100 provides outside dimensions of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has sizing of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-FH100 vs Sony T900 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-FH100 vs the T900.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH100 and T900 is 92 and 96 respectively.

Casio EX-FH100 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements purely by seeing specifications. The photograph here may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FH100 and T900.
Plainly, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Sony T900 to provide greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures more aggressively. The more recent EX-FH100 is going to have an edge in sensor technology.

Casio EX-FH100 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-FH100 vs Sony T900 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Sony |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-10.0 |
Macro focus range | 7cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 2 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 201 grams (0.44 lbs) | 143 grams (0.32 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $299 | $300 |