Casio EX-FH100 vs Sony WX150
92 Imaging
33 Features
36 Overall
34
95 Imaging
41 Features
43 Overall
41
Casio EX-FH100 vs Sony WX150 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Announced June 2010
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 133g - 95 x 56 x 22mm
- Announced February 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-FH100 vs Sony WX150 Overview
Following is a extensive comparison of the Casio EX-FH100 vs Sony WX150, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Casio and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-FH100 (10MP) and WX150 (18MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-FH100 was launched 20 months before the WX150 making them a generation away from each other. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-FH100 scores versus the WX150 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-FH100 vs Sony WX150 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FH100 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH100 Gallery & Sony WX150 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Sony WX150
| EX-FH100 | WX150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony WX150 over the Casio EX-FH100
| WX150 | EX-FH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2012 | June 2010 | More modern by 20 months | |
| Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH100 and Sony WX150
| EX-FH100 | WX150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FH100 vs Sony WX150 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-FH100 provides external dimensions of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs) and the Sony WX150 has specifications of 95mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-FH100 vs Sony WX150 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-FH100 compared to the WX150.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH100 and WX150 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Sony WX150 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to picture the gap in sensor sizes simply by going through a spec sheet. The pic below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FH100 and WX150.
As you can see, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Sony WX150 to produce extra detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged EX-FH100 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FH100 vs Sony WX150 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-FH100 vs Sony WX150 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-06-16 | 2012-02-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 18MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 461k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | - | ClearPhoto TFT LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 201 grams (0.44 pounds) | 133 grams (0.29 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 95 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $299 | $300 |