Casio EX-FH25 vs Casio EX-Z2000
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
Casio EX-FH25 vs Casio EX-Z2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Introduced July 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-FH25 vs Casio EX-Z2000 Overview
Below is a in depth comparison of the Casio EX-FH25 and Casio EX-Z2000, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact and they are both sold by Casio. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and EX-Z2000 (14MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-FH25 was manufactured 7 months later than the EX-Z2000 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the EX-FH25 scores vs the EX-Z2000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-FH25 vs Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 & Casio Exilim EX-Z2000. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery & Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| EX-FH25 | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2010 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Casio EX-FH25
| EX-Z2000 | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Casio EX-Z2000
| EX-FH25 | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Casio EX-Z2000 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-FH25 provides external dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") having a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) while the Casio EX-Z2000 has specifications of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-FH25 and Casio EX-Z2000 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-FH25 against the EX-Z2000.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH25 and EX-Z2000 is 69 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Casio EX-Z2000 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to envision the difference between sensor measurements simply by checking specs. The photograph here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FH25 and EX-Z2000.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Casio EX-Z2000 to give extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The newer EX-FH25 will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Casio EX-Z2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-FH25 vs Casio EX-Z2000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Casio |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2010-07-06 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 461 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 40.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.30 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 524 gr (1.16 pounds) | 152 gr (0.34 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | NP-110 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $450 | $0 |