Casio EX-FH25 vs Casio EX-ZR800
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Casio EX-FH25 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Launched July 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced August 2013
Casio EX-FH25 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Casio EX-FH25 and Casio EX-ZR800, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras and they are both created by Casio. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and EX-ZR800 (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-FH25 was unveiled 4 years before the EX-ZR800 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-FH25 grades versus the EX-ZR800 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 & Casio Exilim EX-ZR800. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery & Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Casio EX-ZR800
EX-FH25 | EX-ZR800 |
---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Casio EX-FH25
EX-ZR800 | EX-FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2013 | July 2010 | Fresher by 37 months | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Casio EX-ZR800
EX-FH25 | EX-ZR800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-FH25 offers exterior dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") along with a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) while the Casio EX-ZR800 has specifications of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-FH25 and Casio EX-ZR800 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-FH25 vs the EX-ZR800.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH25 and EX-ZR800 is 69 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing simply by going through specs. The visual here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH25 and EX-ZR800.
All in all, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR800 to show greater detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older EX-FH25 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FH25 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Casio |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2010-07-06 | 2013-08-07 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | EXILIM Engine HS 3 |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 4cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 40.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.30 m | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 524 gr (1.16 lbs) | 222 gr (0.49 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 470 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | NP-130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $450 | $429 |