Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
90 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Launched July 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 260g - 124 x 68 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and FujiFilm. The resolution of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (10MP) is pretty close and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-FH25 was brought out 12 months after the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 so they are of a similar generation. The two cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the EX-FH25 scores versus the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W1
| EX-FH25 | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2010 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 12 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.8" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W1 over the Casio EX-FH25
| Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | EX-FH25 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Fujifilm Real 3D W1
| EX-FH25 | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FH25 offers external dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") along with a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) and the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 has dimensions of 124mm x 68mm x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") and a weight of 260 grams (0.57 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-FH25 compared to the Fujifilm Real 3D W1.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH25 and Fujifilm Real 3D W1 is 69 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizes purely by looking through technical specs. The pic below will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FH25 and Fujifilm Real 3D W1.
As you can tell, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same resolution so you should expect comparable quality of files however you might want to take the release date of the cameras into account. The more recent EX-FH25 should have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-07-06 | 2009-07-22 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | RP (Real Photo) 3D |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.7-4.2 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 8cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.8 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 40.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.30 m | 3.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 524 gr (1.16 lb) | 260 gr (0.57 lb) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 124 x 68 x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | NP-95 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $450 | $900 |