Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Launched July 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Released August 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) is pretty close and they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-FH25 was launched within a month of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 so they are of a similar age. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-FH25 scores versus the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 & Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery & Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| EX-FH25 | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Casio EX-FH25
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1150k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+920k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| EX-FH25 | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2010 |  | August 2010 | Same age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FH25 provides exterior measurements of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") along with a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) and the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 has sizing of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-FH25 compared to the Fujifilm Real 3D W3.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH25 and Fujifilm Real 3D W3 is 69 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to see the difference in sensor dimensions purely by viewing specs. The pic here may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FH25 and Fujifilm Real 3D W3.
All in all, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact MP so you can expect comparable quality of pictures though you may want to consider the launch date of the cameras into account.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-07-06 | 2010-08-17 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.7-4.2 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 8cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 1,150 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 1/4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 40.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.30 m | 3.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 524 gr (1.16 lb) | 230 gr (0.51 lb) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | NP-50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $450 | $900 |