Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm S4800
69 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
66 Imaging
40 Features
37 Overall
38
Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm S4800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Announced July 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 518g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Revealed January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm S4800 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm S4800, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Casio and FujiFilm. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and Fujifilm S4800 (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe EX-FH25 was revealed 3 years prior to the Fujifilm S4800 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief view of how the EX-FH25 matches up against the Fujifilm S4800 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm S4800 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Fujifilm FinePix S4800. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Fujifilm S4800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Fujifilm S4800
| EX-FH25 | Fujifilm S4800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S4800 over the Casio EX-FH25
| Fujifilm S4800 | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 31 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Fujifilm S4800
| EX-FH25 | Fujifilm S4800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm S4800 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FH25 enjoys outside dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) and the Fujifilm S4800 has dimensions of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 518 grams (1.14 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm S4800 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-FH25 versus the Fujifilm S4800.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH25 and Fujifilm S4800 is 69 and 66 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm S4800 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizes merely by looking through specifications. The picture below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH25 and Fujifilm S4800.
To sum up, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Fujifilm S4800 to render greater detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-FH25 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm S4800 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm S4800 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Fujifilm FinePix S4800 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Fujifilm FinePix S4800 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-07-06 | 2013-01-30 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 40.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.30 m | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 524 grams (1.16 lbs) | 518 grams (1.14 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $450 | $229 |
