Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm S9900w
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
61 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm S9900w Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Launched July 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Launched January 2015
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm S9900w Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm S9900w, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Casio and FujiFilm. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and Fujifilm S9900w (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-FH25 was released 5 years prior to the Fujifilm S9900w and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the EX-FH25 grades versus the Fujifilm S9900w in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm S9900w Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 & Fujifilm S9900w. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery & Fujifilm S9900w Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Fujifilm S9900w
| EX-FH25 | Fujifilm S9900w |
|---|
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9900w over the Casio EX-FH25
| Fujifilm S9900w | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2015 |  | July 2010 | Fresher by 55 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Fujifilm S9900w
| EX-FH25 | Fujifilm S9900w | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm S9900w Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FH25 has outer measurements of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") and a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm S9900w has sizing of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") having a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm S9900w in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-FH25 and the Fujifilm S9900w.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH25 and Fujifilm S9900w is 69 and 61 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm S9900w Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizing just by reading through specs. The graphic underneath might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FH25 and Fujifilm S9900w.
All in all, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Fujifilm S9900w to resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The older EX-FH25 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm S9900w Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-FH25 vs Fujifilm S9900w Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Fujifilm S9900w | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Fujifilm S9900w |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-07-06 | 2015-01-14 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 7cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 920k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 97 percent |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1700s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 40.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.30 m | 7.00 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (6oi), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 524g (1.16 lbs) | 670g (1.48 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $450 | $719 |