Casio EX-FH25 vs Kodak Z981
69 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
66 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Casio EX-FH25 vs Kodak Z981 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Introduced July 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 540g - 124 x 85 x 105mm
- Released July 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-FH25 vs Kodak Z981 Overview
Here is a complete analysis of the Casio EX-FH25 vs Kodak Z981, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Casio and Kodak. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and Z981 (14MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-FH25 was manufactured very close to the Z981 so they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the EX-FH25 scores versus the Z981 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-FH25 vs Kodak Z981 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Kodak EasyShare Z981. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Kodak Z981 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Kodak Z981
| EX-FH25 | Z981 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 201k | Crisper display (+29k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z981 over the Casio EX-FH25
| Z981 | EX-FH25 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Kodak Z981
| EX-FH25 | Z981 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2010 |  | July 2010 | Similar generation |
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Kodak Z981 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-FH25 features exterior dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") having a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) while the Kodak Z981 has specifications of 124mm x 85mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") having a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-FH25 vs Kodak Z981 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose during that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the EX-FH25 and the Z981.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH25 and Z981 is 69 and 66 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Kodak Z981 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizing only by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FH25 and Z981.
As you can see, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Kodak Z981 to resolve greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images much more aggressively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Kodak Z981 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-FH25 vs Kodak Z981 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Kodak EasyShare Z981 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Kodak |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Kodak EasyShare Z981 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-07-06 | 2010-07-06 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 201 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 40.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.30 m | 6.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 524 grams (1.16 lb) | 540 grams (1.19 lb) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 124 x 85 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $450 | $299 |
