Casio EX-FH25 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
65 Imaging
45 Features
56 Overall
49
Casio EX-FH25 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Launched July 2010
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Revealed January 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-FH25 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Casio EX-FH25 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Casio and Kodak. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-FH25 was launched 4 years prior to the Astro Zoom AZ651 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the EX-FH25 grades against the Astro Zoom AZ651 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FH25 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 & Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery & Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
| EX-FH25 | Astro Zoom AZ651 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Casio EX-FH25
| Astro Zoom AZ651 | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 42 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
| EX-FH25 | Astro Zoom AZ651 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FH25 has exterior measurements of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") with a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 has dimensions of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") along with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-FH25 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-FH25 compared to the Astro Zoom AZ651.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FH25 and Astro Zoom AZ651 is 69 and 65 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes simply by looking at specifications. The pic underneath will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FH25 and Astro Zoom AZ651.
To sum up, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to give extra detail utilizing its extra 11MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged EX-FH25 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-FH25 vs Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Kodak |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-07-06 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 21MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 24-1560mm (65.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 40.0 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.30 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 524 grams (1.16 pounds) | 567 grams (1.25 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $450 | $419 |