Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon L820
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
![Casio Exilim EX-FH25 front Casio Exilim EX-FH25 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-FH25/Casio-EX-FH25-front.jpg)
![Nikon Coolpix L820 front Nikon Coolpix L820 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-L820/Nikon-L820-front.jpg)
72 Imaging
40 Features
28 Overall
35
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon L820 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Released July 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-675mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 470g - 111 x 76 x 85mm
- Announced January 2013
- Succeeded the Nikon L810
- Successor is Nikon L830
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon L820 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Casio EX-FH25 and Nikon L820, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Casio and Nikon. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and L820 (16MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
The EX-FH25 was introduced 3 years before the L820 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before getting in to a full comparison, below is a quick summary of how the EX-FH25 grades vs the L820 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon L820 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Nikon Coolpix L820. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Nikon L820 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Nikon L820
EX-FH25 | L820 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Nikon L820 over the Casio EX-FH25
L820 | EX-FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | ![]() | July 2010 | Newer by 31 months |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Nikon L820
EX-FH25 | L820 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lacking Touch display |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon L820 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-FH25 comes with external measurements of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) whilst the Nikon L820 has proportions of 111mm x 76mm x 85mm (4.4" x 3.0" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 470 grams (1.04 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-FH25 and Nikon L820 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-FH25 compared to the L820.
![Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon L820 size comparison Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon L820 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-FH25-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-L820-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FH25 and L820 is 69 and 72 respectively.
![Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon L820 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon L820 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-FH25-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-L820-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon L820 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions merely by going over specifications. The image underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FH25 and L820.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Nikon L820 to deliver extra detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged EX-FH25 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
![Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon L820 sensor size comparison Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon L820 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-FH25-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-L820-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon L820 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon L820 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon L820 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-FH25-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-L820-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon L820 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Nikon Coolpix L820 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Nikon |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Nikon Coolpix L820 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2010-07-06 | 2013-01-29 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 23-675mm (29.3x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.0-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 40.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.30 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 524 gr (1.16 lb) | 470 gr (1.04 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 111 x 76 x 85mm (4.4" x 3.0" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 photographs |
Battery type | - | AA |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $450 | $192 |