Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon L840
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
67 Imaging
41 Features
48 Overall
43
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon L840 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Released July 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-855mm (F3.0-6.5) lens
- 538g - 114 x 89 x 96mm
- Launched February 2015
- Succeeded the Nikon L830
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon L840 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Casio EX-FH25 versus Nikon L840, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Casio and Nikon. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and L840 (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-FH25 was released 5 years before the L840 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the EX-FH25 grades versus the L840 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon L840 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 & Nikon Coolpix L840. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery & Nikon L840 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Nikon L840
| EX-FH25 | L840 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Nikon L840 over the Casio EX-FH25
| L840 | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2015 |  | July 2010 | More recent by 56 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Nikon L840
| EX-FH25 | L840 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon L840 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FH25 features physical measurements of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") with a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) and the Nikon L840 has sizing of 114mm x 89mm x 96mm (4.5" x 3.5" x 3.8") and a weight of 538 grams (1.19 lbs).
See the Casio EX-FH25 versus Nikon L840 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-FH25 and the L840.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FH25 and L840 is 69 and 67 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon L840 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to picture the gap between sensor measurements merely by checking technical specs. The visual underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FH25 and L840.
As you have seen, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can anticipate the Nikon L840 to resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics far more aggressively. The older EX-FH25 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon L840 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon L840 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Nikon Coolpix L840 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Nikon |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Nikon Coolpix L840 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-07-06 | 2015-02-10 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 23-855mm (37.2x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.0-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 40.0 frames/s | 7.4 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.30 m | 6.90 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 524g (1.16 pounds) | 538g (1.19 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 114 x 89 x 96mm (4.5" x 3.5" x 3.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 590 images |
| Type of battery | - | AA |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $450 | $400 |