Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon S8200
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
91 Imaging
39 Features
47 Overall
42
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon S8200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Released July 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-350mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 213g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched August 2011
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon S8200 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Casio EX-FH25 and Nikon S8200, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Casio and Nikon. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and S8200 (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-FH25 was launched 13 months prior to the S8200 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Nikon S8200 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a thorough comparison, below is a brief summary of how the EX-FH25 grades against the S8200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon S8200 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Nikon Coolpix S8200. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Nikon S8200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Nikon S8200
EX-FH25 | S8200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Nikon S8200 over the Casio EX-FH25
S8200 | EX-FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2011 | July 2010 | Fresher by 13 months | |
Screen resolution | 961k | 230k | Sharper screen (+731k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Nikon S8200
EX-FH25 | S8200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon S8200 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FH25 offers physical dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") along with a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) whilst the Nikon S8200 has measurements of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 213 grams (0.47 lbs).
See the Casio EX-FH25 and Nikon S8200 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-FH25 versus the S8200.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH25 and S8200 is 69 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon S8200 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing just by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FH25 and S8200.
As you can see, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You should count on the Nikon S8200 to give you extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The older EX-FH25 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon S8200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon S8200 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Nikon Coolpix S8200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Nikon |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Nikon Coolpix S8200 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2010-07-06 | 2011-08-24 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Expeed C2 |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 25-350mm (14.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 961k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 40.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.30 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 524 grams (1.16 pounds) | 213 grams (0.47 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 pictures |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | EN-EL12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail price | $450 | $329 |