Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon S9300
Portability
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
91 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon S9300 Key Specs
Casio EX-FH25
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Revealed July 2010
Nikon S9300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 215g - 109 x 62 x 31mm
- Announced July 2012
- Superseded the Nikon S9100
- Refreshed by Nikon S9500
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon S9300 Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Casio EX-FH25 and Nikon S9300, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Casio and Nikon. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and S9300 (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-FH25 was unveiled 24 months prior to the S9300 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Nikon S9300 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise view of how the EX-FH25 scores vs the S9300 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon S9300 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 & Nikon Coolpix S9300. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery & Nikon S9300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Nikon S9300
| EX-FH25 | S9300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Nikon S9300 over the Casio EX-FH25
| S9300 | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2012 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 24 months |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Nikon S9300
| EX-FH25 | S9300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon S9300 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FH25 features physical measurements of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") with a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) whilst the Nikon S9300 has measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-FH25 and Nikon S9300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-FH25 versus the S9300.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FH25 and S9300 is 69 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon S9300 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes just by researching specs. The image below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FH25 and S9300.
All in all, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Nikon S9300 to render greater detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-FH25 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon S9300 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-FH25 Portrait photography highlights
Nikon S9300 Portrait photography highlights
manual focus
exports RAW files
cannot use external flash
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
supports face detect focus
manual focus not available
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Casio EX-FH25 Street photography advice
Nikon S9300 Street photography advice
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
heavier than competitors in class (524g)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (215 grams)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Casio EX-FH25 Sports photography info
Nikon S9300 Sports photography info
incredible zoom range (26-520mm 20.0 x zoom)
max frames per second high (40.0 fps)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
excellent zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
supports tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (200 per charge)
lacks phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Casio EX-FH25 Travel photography info
Nikon S9300 Travel photography info
built-in flash
reasonably wide (26mm)
very long zoom (520mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than competitors in class (524 grams)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
lighter than average in class (215g)
resolution is good (16MP)
has built in flash
quite wide (25mm)
long reach (450mm)
lack of Timelapse function
bad battery pack (200 CIPA)
does not have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-FH25 Landscape photography details
Nikon S9300 Landscape photography details
manual focus
reasonably wide (26mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
missing Time Lapse mode
quite wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
manual focus not available
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual exposure
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
bad battery pack (200 CIPA)
lack of Timelapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FH25 as a Vlogging camera
Nikon S9300 as a Vlogging camera
reasonably wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
missing mic support
heavier than competitors in class (524g)
quite wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average in class (215g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not have a selfie friendly display
lack of microphone socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon S9300 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Nikon Coolpix S9300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Nikon |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Nikon Coolpix S9300 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-07-06 | 2012-07-16 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 4cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 40.0 frames per second | 6.9 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.30 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 524 gr (1.16 pounds) | 215 gr (0.47 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 109 x 62 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 200 photos |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $450 | $249 |