Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon S9500
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
92 Imaging
42 Features
37 Overall
40
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon S9500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Launched July 2010
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-550mm (F) lens
- 205g - 110 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched January 2013
- Old Model is Nikon S9300
- Updated by Nikon S9700
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon S9500 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Casio EX-FH25 versus Nikon S9500, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Casio and Nikon. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and S9500 (18MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-FH25 was announced 3 years earlier than the S9500 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Nikon S9500 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-FH25 scores versus the S9500 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon S9500 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 & Nikon Coolpix S9500. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery & Nikon S9500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Nikon S9500
EX-FH25 | S9500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Nikon S9500 over the Casio EX-FH25
S9500 | EX-FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | July 2010 | More modern by 31 months | |
Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Sharper display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Nikon S9500
EX-FH25 | S9500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon S9500 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FH25 offers outer measurements of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") with a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) and the Nikon S9500 has measurements of 110mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-FH25 versus Nikon S9500 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-FH25 and the S9500.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FH25 and S9500 is 69 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon S9500 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes merely by reviewing technical specs. The image here will give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FH25 and S9500.
As you can tell, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You can expect to see the Nikon S9500 to offer you more detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged EX-FH25 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon S9500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon S9500 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Nikon Coolpix S9500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Nikon |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Nikon Coolpix S9500 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2010-07-06 | 2013-01-29 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 99 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 25-550mm (22.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 614k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | - | OLED monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 40.0 frames/s | 7.5 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.30 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 524g (1.16 pounds) | 205g (0.45 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 110 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 230 pictures |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | EN-EL12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $450 | $230 |