Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon S9700
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
90 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon S9700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Introduced July 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 232g - 110 x 64 x 35mm
- Launched February 2014
- Old Model is Nikon S9500
- Refreshed by Nikon S9900
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon S9700 Overview
Following is a complete assessment of the Casio EX-FH25 and Nikon S9700, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Casio and Nikon. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and S9700 (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-FH25 was revealed 4 years earlier than the S9700 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Nikon S9700 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the EX-FH25 matches up vs the S9700 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon S9700 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 & Nikon Coolpix S9700. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery & Nikon S9700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Nikon S9700
EX-FH25 | S9700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Nikon S9700 over the Casio EX-FH25
S9700 | EX-FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | July 2010 | More modern by 43 months | |
Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Nikon S9700
EX-FH25 | S9700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon S9700 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FH25 has got physical dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") along with a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) whilst the Nikon S9700 has sizing of 110mm x 64mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-FH25 and Nikon S9700 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that moment. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-FH25 versus the S9700.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH25 and S9700 is 69 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon S9700 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to picture the difference in sensor sizes simply by checking out specifications. The picture here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH25 and S9700.
To sum up, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You can anticipate the Nikon S9700 to produce greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged EX-FH25 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon S9700 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FH25 vs Nikon S9700 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Nikon Coolpix S9700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Nikon |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Nikon Coolpix S9700 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2010-07-06 | 2014-02-07 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 99 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 25-750mm (30.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.7-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 40.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.30 m | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | TTL auto flash with monitor preflashes |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30/25p, 60/50i) 1280 x 720 (60/50/30/25/15/12.5p) 960 x 540 (30/25p) 640 x 480 (120/30/25p) 320 x 240 (240p) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 524g (1.16 pounds) | 232g (0.51 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 110 x 64 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | EN-EL12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $450 | $350 |