Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
72 Imaging
32 Features
32 Overall
32
Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Introduced July 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Released January 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Casio EX-FH25 and Olympus SP-565UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and the SP-565UZ (10MP) is relatively well matched and they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-FH25 was launched 18 months later than the SP-565UZ which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a short view of how the EX-FH25 matches up against the SP-565UZ when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Olympus SP-565UZ. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| EX-FH25 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2010 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 18 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Casio EX-FH25
| SP-565UZ | EX-FH25 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Olympus SP-565UZ
| EX-FH25 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FH25 enjoys outside measurements of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") having a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) while the Olympus SP-565UZ has sizing of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-FH25 and Olympus SP-565UZ in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is the front view size comparison of the EX-FH25 compared to the SP-565UZ.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH25 and SP-565UZ is 69 and 72 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizing just by looking at specs. The graphic below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FH25 and SP-565UZ.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same megapixels and you should expect similar quality of photographs though you really should consider the production date of the products into consideration. The more recent EX-FH25 should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-07-06 | 2009-01-15 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 143 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.8-4.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 40.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.30 m | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 524 grams (1.16 pounds) | 413 grams (0.91 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 30 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.1 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 68 |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | xD Picture Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $450 | $400 |