Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus SZ-12
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
89 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus SZ-12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Released July 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Launched January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus SZ-12 Overview
In this article, we are reviewing the Casio EX-FH25 and Olympus SZ-12, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Casio and Olympus. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and SZ-12 (14MP) but they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-FH25 was released 18 months before the SZ-12 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SZ-12 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick overview of how the EX-FH25 matches up vs the SZ-12 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus SZ-12 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 & Olympus SZ-12. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery & Olympus SZ-12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Olympus SZ-12
| EX-FH25 | SZ-12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-12 over the Casio EX-FH25
| SZ-12 | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | July 2010 | Newer by 18 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Olympus SZ-12
| EX-FH25 | SZ-12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus SZ-12 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-FH25 has got physical measurements of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") and a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) whilst the Olympus SZ-12 has proportions of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") having a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-FH25 and Olympus SZ-12 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-FH25 compared to the SZ-12.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH25 and SZ-12 is 69 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus SZ-12 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions only by seeing specs. The pic here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FH25 and SZ-12.
As you can plainly see, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus SZ-12 to show greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-FH25 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus SZ-12 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus SZ-12 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Olympus SZ-12 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Olympus SZ-12 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-07-06 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1700s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 40.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.30 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 524 grams (1.16 lbs) | 226 grams (0.50 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 images |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $450 | $350 |