Clicky

Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS

Portability
69
Imaging
33
Features
37
Overall
34
Casio Exilim EX-FH25 front
 
Olympus TG-820 iHS front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
37
Overall
35

Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs

Casio EX-FH25
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
  • 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
  • Revealed July 2010
Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
  • Introduced February 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview

The following is a in-depth review of the Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The EX-FH25 was released 19 months prior to the TG-820 iHS which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a short view of how the EX-FH25 grades vs the TG-820 iHS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS

 EX-FH25 TG-820 iHS 
Manual focus More accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Casio EX-FH25

 TG-820 iHS EX-FH25 
IntroducedFebruary 2012July 2010Newer by 19 months
Screen resolution1030k230kSharper screen (+800k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Olympus TG-820 iHS

 EX-FH25 TG-820 iHS 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen size
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch screen Neither provides Touch screen

Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to travel with your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FH25 provides external dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") and a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) while the Olympus TG-820 iHS has measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).

Check the Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at that moment. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-FH25 against the TG-820 iHS.

Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH25 and TG-820 iHS is 69 and 92 respectively.

Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be difficult to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions purely by going through technical specs. The picture underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FH25 and TG-820 iHS.

As you have seen, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Olympus TG-820 iHS to provide greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-FH25 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison

Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-FH25 Portrait photography features
Olympus TG-820 iHS Portrait photography features
35
manual focus
exports RAW formats
cannot use external flash
low MP (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
26
comes with face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
MP count low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-FH25
Street photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
51
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
more heavy than competitors (524g)
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio EX-FH25
Sports photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
41
incredible zoom range (26-520mm 20.0 x zoom)
max fps high (40.0 frames per second)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking focus
weather proofing
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority
MP count low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (220 shots)
lacks phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-FH25 Travel photography advice
Olympus TG-820 iHS Travel photography advice
49
flash built-in
really wide (26mm)
very long reach (520mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors (524 grams)
low MP (10 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
58
weather proofing
built-in flash
rather wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
bad battery pack (220 per charge)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-FH25 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Landscape photography camera
45
manual focus
really wide (26mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of Timelapse mode
38
rather wide (28mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
manual focus not available
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
manual mode not possible
MP count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
bad battery pack (220 per charge)
missing Time Lapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-FH25 Vlogging features
Olympus TG-820 iHS Vlogging features
22
really wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of microphone port
more heavy than competitors (524g)
33
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing mic port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-FH25 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
 Casio Exilim EX-FH25Olympus TG-820 iHS
General Information
Company Casio Olympus
Model Casio Exilim EX-FH25 Olympus TG-820 iHS
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Revealed 2010-07-06 2012-02-08
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic VI
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 3968 x 2976
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-520mm (20.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.8-4.5 f/3.9-5.9
Macro focus range 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230k dot 1,030k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology - HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Features
Min shutter speed 30 seconds 4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 40.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.30 m 3.50 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 524g (1.16 pounds) 206g (0.45 pounds)
Physical dimensions 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 220 photos
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model 4 x AA LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Launch price $450 $500