Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus VR-320
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Revealed July 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Following is a thorough overview of the Casio EX-FH25 and Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and VR-320 (14MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-FH25 was brought out 12 months before the VR-320 which means that they are of a similar age. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a simple view of how the EX-FH25 grades versus the VR-320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 & Olympus VR-320. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Olympus VR-320
| EX-FH25 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Casio EX-FH25
| VR-320 | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2011 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 12 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Olympus VR-320
| EX-FH25 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FH25 offers outer measurements of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-FH25 and Olympus VR-320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-FH25 and the VR-320.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FH25 and VR-320 is 69 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes purely by looking through specs. The image below might give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FH25 and VR-320.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Olympus VR-320 to render greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged EX-FH25 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-07-06 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 40.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.30 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 524g (1.16 lb) | 158g (0.35 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $450 | $179 |