Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus VR-330
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Launched July 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released February 2011
- Old Model is Olympus VR-320
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Casio EX-FH25 versus Olympus VR-330, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Casio and Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and VR-330 (14MP) but they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-FH25 was launched 7 months before the VR-330 and they are of a similar generation. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple summation of how the EX-FH25 grades against the VR-330 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Olympus VR-330. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Olympus VR-330
| EX-FH25 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Casio EX-FH25
| VR-330 | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2011 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 7 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Olympus VR-330
| EX-FH25 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-FH25 enjoys physical dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") and a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-330 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-FH25 versus Olympus VR-330 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-FH25 vs the VR-330.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FH25 and VR-330 is 69 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes only by reading through a spec sheet. The image here should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH25 and VR-330.
As you can see, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should expect the Olympus VR-330 to give you greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-FH25 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-FH25 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-07-06 | 2011-02-08 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 40.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.30 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 524 gr (1.16 pounds) | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $450 | $220 |