Casio EX-FH25 vs Pentax XG-1
69 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
66 Imaging
41 Features
37 Overall
39
Casio EX-FH25 vs Pentax XG-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Announced July 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1248mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 567g - 119 x 89 x 98mm
- Revealed July 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-FH25 vs Pentax XG-1 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Casio EX-FH25 vs Pentax XG-1, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Casio and Pentax. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and XG-1 (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe EX-FH25 was brought out 5 years prior to the XG-1 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before going through a thorough comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the EX-FH25 grades vs the XG-1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Casio EX-FH25 vs Pentax XG-1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Pentax XG-1. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Pentax XG-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Pentax XG-1
| EX-FH25 | XG-1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax XG-1 over the Casio EX-FH25
| XG-1 | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2014 |  | July 2010 | Fresher by 49 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Pentax XG-1
| EX-FH25 | XG-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Pentax XG-1 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-FH25 comes with exterior dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") along with a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) whilst the Pentax XG-1 has proportions of 119mm x 89mm x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") and a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-FH25 vs Pentax XG-1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-FH25 versus the XG-1.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH25 and XG-1 is 69 and 66 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Pentax XG-1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizing simply by viewing specs. The photograph below may give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FH25 and XG-1.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You should anticipate the Pentax XG-1 to render extra detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-FH25 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Pentax XG-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-FH25 vs Pentax XG-1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Pentax XG-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Pentax |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Pentax XG-1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-07-06 | 2014-07-15 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 24-1248mm (52.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.8-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dots |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 40.0fps | 9.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.30 m | 6.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Force Off, Flash Auto, Force Flash, Slow Sync., Slow Sync. + Red-Eye, Red-Eye Reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 524 grams (1.16 pounds) | 567 grams (1.25 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 119 x 89 x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | LB-060 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $450 | $599 |
