Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh G900
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Launched July 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2018
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh G900 Overview
Here is a extended comparison of the Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh G900, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and G900 (20MP) but they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-FH25 was launched 8 years before the G900 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh G900 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the EX-FH25 matches up against the G900 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh G900 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Ricoh G900. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Ricoh G900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Ricoh G900
| EX-FH25 | G900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Casio EX-FH25
| G900 | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2018 |  | July 2010 | Fresher by 92 months |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Ricoh G900
| EX-FH25 | G900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FH25 has physical dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") along with a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) whilst the Ricoh G900 has sizing of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh G900 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-FH25 compared to the G900.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH25 and G900 is 69 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing only by looking through specs. The visual here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FH25 and G900.
All in all, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Ricoh G900 to result in extra detail utilizing its extra 10MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics far more aggressively. The older EX-FH25 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Ricoh G900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Ricoh G900 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2010-07-06 | 2018-02-21 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 40.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.30 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Flash on, flash off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 524g (1.16 lb) | 247g (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 shots |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $450 | $752 |