Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Released July 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Introduced April 2013
- Newer Model is Ricoh GR II
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR Overview
Here is a detailed comparison of the Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and GR (16MP) and the EX-FH25 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) boast different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-FH25 was brought out 3 years before the GR and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-FH25 matches up versus the GR in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 & Ricoh GR. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery & Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Ricoh GR
EX-FH25 | GR |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Casio EX-FH25
GR | EX-FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2013 | July 2010 | Fresher by 33 months | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 230k | Crisper display (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Ricoh GR
EX-FH25 | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-FH25 enjoys external measurements of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") having a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) while the Ricoh GR has proportions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have during that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-FH25 and the GR.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH25 and GR is 69 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing only by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FH25 and GR.
As you can see, the 2 cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-FH25 because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Ricoh GR will produce extra detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-FH25 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Ricoh GR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Ricoh GR |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-07-06 | 2013-04-17 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4928 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 300 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 40.0 frames per second | 4.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.30 m | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/4000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 524 gr (1.16 pounds) | 245 gr (0.54 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 972 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $450 | $971 |