Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e49ae/e49aef02731bb86879a7a1fb2af553da6ffe5e22" alt="Casio Exilim EX-FH25 front Casio Exilim EX-FH25 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66cf9/66cf9a75906dc0e9f2d3d249d34bb9f3f9d5798c" alt="Ricoh GR Digital IV front Ricoh GR Digital IV front"
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Announced July 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Released September 2011
- Older Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Here is a thorough assessment of the Casio EX-FH25 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is relatively well matched but the EX-FH25 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The EX-FH25 was announced 14 months earlier than the GR Digital IV which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a short overview of how the EX-FH25 scores versus the GR Digital IV with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Ricoh GR Digital IV. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
EX-FH25 | GR Digital IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Casio EX-FH25
GR Digital IV | EX-FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2011 | ![]() | July 2010 | Fresher by 14 months |
Screen resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
EX-FH25 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-FH25 features outer dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") having a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital IV has proportions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-FH25 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-FH25 vs the GR Digital IV.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd008/cd00844e0bc68ebdc2cac784318db8aa1833fd81" alt="Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH25 and GR Digital IV is 69 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cac6d/cac6d4cfe0b44895bd9d22a2924ab20a7806bfd9" alt="Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to see the contrast between sensor sizing merely by checking specifications. The photograph here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH25 and GR Digital IV.
To sum up, each of these cameras have the same megapixel count albeit not the same sensor sizing. The EX-FH25 provides the tinier sensor which will make achieving bokeh more challenging. The older EX-FH25 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b5b4/4b5b42995de2114b5a7673c973c9dd5cdd7ac76c" alt="Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aba26/aba2628c908c9f05ae10e8a858ce1572c9d13161" alt="Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2010-07-06 | 2011-09-15 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 1 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 40.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.30 m | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 524 gr (1.16 lbs) | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 390 pictures |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $450 | $599 |