Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
77 Imaging
51 Features
31 Overall
43
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Revealed July 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Introduced November 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Here is a thorough analysis of the Casio EX-FH25 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is very comparable but the EX-FH25 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) use totally different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe EX-FH25 was unveiled 8 months later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the EX-FH25 matches up vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
| EX-FH25 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2010 | November 2009 | Fresher by 8 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Casio EX-FH25
| GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
| EX-FH25 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | No Touch display |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-FH25 provides outside measurements of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") having a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has sizing of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-FH25 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at the time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-FH25 vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH25 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 69 and 77 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to see the difference in sensor sizing only by checking out technical specs. The graphic here will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FH25 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you have seen, each of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-FH25 having a smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will provide extra detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a little more aggressively. The fresher EX-FH25 is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2010-07-06 | 2009-11-10 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | GR engine III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 2848 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 180 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 40.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.30 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 524g (1.16 lb) | 453g (1.00 lb) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 320 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $450 | $566 |