Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Launched July 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Introduced March 2010
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
Here is a comprehensive overview of the Casio EX-FH25 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is pretty similar but the EX-FH25 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") possess different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-FH25 was revealed 4 months later than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a quick summation of how the EX-FH25 matches up vs the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
EX-FH25 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Casio EX-FH25
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | EX-FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
EX-FH25 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2010 | March 2010 | Similar generation | |
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-FH25 comes with physical measurements of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") and a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-FH25 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the EX-FH25 against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH25 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 69 and 85 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizing simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-FH25 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have got the exact same MP albeit different sensor sizing. The EX-FH25 has got the tinier sensor which should make getting bokeh tougher.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2010-07-06 | 2010-03-18 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 180 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 40.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.30 m | 4.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 524 grams (1.16 lb) | 355 grams (0.78 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $450 | $349 |