Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh WG-30
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Announced July 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced October 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-FH25 and Ricoh WG-30, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and WG-30 (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-FH25 was launched 5 years prior to the WG-30 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh WG-30 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-FH25 grades vs the WG-30 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 & Ricoh WG-30. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery & Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Ricoh WG-30
| EX-FH25 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Casio EX-FH25
| WG-30 | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | October 2014 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 51 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Ricoh WG-30
| EX-FH25 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FH25 has got exterior dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-30 has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
See the Casio EX-FH25 and Ricoh WG-30 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-FH25 against the WG-30.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FH25 and WG-30 is 69 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to envision the gap between sensor sizes simply by reading through specifications. The picture here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH25 and WG-30.
Plainly, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Ricoh WG-30 to resolve more detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged EX-FH25 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Ricoh WG-30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Ricoh WG-30 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2010-07-06 | 2014-10-09 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 40.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.30 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 524 grams (1.16 pounds) | 192 grams (0.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $450 | $428 |