Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34


90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Released July 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
- Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS

Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").

The EX-FH25 was released 4 years earlier than the WG-4 GPS and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a brief view of how the EX-FH25 grades against the WG-4 GPS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
EX-FH25 | WG-4 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Casio EX-FH25
WG-4 GPS | EX-FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | ![]() | July 2010 | Fresher by 43 months |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
EX-FH25 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FH25 comes with outside dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-FH25 vs the WG-4 GPS.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH25 and WG-4 GPS is 69 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing only by going over specs. The graphic below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH25 and WG-4 GPS.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should count on the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to offer you more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older EX-FH25 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Released | 2010-07-06 | 2014-02-05 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 40.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.30 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 524g (1.16 pounds) | 235g (0.52 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 pictures |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $450 | $210 |