Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh WG-M1
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Launched July 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Below is a in-depth comparison of the Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and WG-M1 (14MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-FH25 was unveiled 5 years earlier than the WG-M1 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a full comparison, below is a brief view of how the EX-FH25 scores vs the WG-M1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 & Ricoh WG-M1. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-FH25 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Casio EX-FH25
| WG-M1 | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | July 2010 | More recent by 50 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-FH25 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FH25 provides outside measurements of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") having a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh WG-M1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-FH25 compared to the WG-M1.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH25 and WG-M1 is 69 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements purely by looking through technical specs. The visual underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-FH25 and WG-M1.
As you can tell, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Ricoh WG-M1 to provide you with more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The older EX-FH25 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2010-07-06 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | (1×) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 1.5" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 115k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 40.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.30 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 524 gr (1.16 pounds) | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $450 | $2,000 |